Skip to content
TrendDeck

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Determine President Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Role in the World

Following executing a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be getting into the state-building arena.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief stated that US military forces had successfully captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then said that a delegation including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the embattled nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What exactly "governing the state" actually means is unclear, but the vow marks an sudden shift in direction for the president, full of contradictions and formidable challenges.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now betting his presidency on effectively revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is in shambles and whose governmental stability has been eroded by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently confident.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He vowed to recruit American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, providing financing for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has reshaped Venezuela's prospects – for better or worse.

Trump took office nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has shown that he is quite prepared to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike previous actions, which have mostly involved rockets and warplanes that minimize the exposure of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are markedly different.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That twist on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra might prove difficult for some of Trump's followers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of deserting his political base, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's never ending use of force and support of overseas conflicts is justified because we are compelled to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "illegitimate government" as "decisive and legitimate".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect trade, territory and assets that are core to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise broader questions in global politics, however, and impact American ties with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing surprise and denouncing what it said was a reckless assault on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced concern about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were blunter.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's decision not to consult with legislative leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his remarks, said that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" details of the operation before the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That military operation was a success – with no American deaths and minimal harm to US assets. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most stunning, effective and impressive displays of American power and proficiency in US history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that victory enduring, as the US says it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails is unknown. He and his administration must rebuild a nation that has been in chaos for years while calming a hemisphere that is sure to be cautious of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

The writer

Dr. Elizabeth Jensen

Aria Vance is a data scientist and business strategist specializing in AI applications for market analysis and trend forecasting.

TrendDeck

Type to search articles.